| Year: | 2010 | Online version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Publication: | Article | ||
| Authors: |
|
||
| Journal: | Dig Dis Sci | Volume: 55 | |
| Number: | 3 | Pages: 852-60 | |
| Month: | March | ||
| ISSN: | 1573-2568 (Electronic) 0163-2116 | ||
| Note: | Huang, Edward S Gazelle, G Scott Hur, Chin K07 CA107060-05/CA/NCI
NIH HHS/ K07CA107060/CA/NCI NIH HHS/ T32 DK007191-35/DK/NIDDK NIH
HHS/ T32DK007191/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/ Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Mar;55(3):852-60.
Epub 2009 Oct 16. |
||
| Abstract: | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Based on consensus guidelines, surgical resection
of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN)
is indicated in patients with symptoms of cyst size >or=30 mm, intramural
nodules, or dilated main pancreatic duct greater than 6 mm. The aim
of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of consensus
guideline implementation in the management of BD-IPMN. METHODS: We
developed a decision analytic model to compare the costs and effectiveness
of three management strategies for a cohort of 60-year-old patients
with branch duct IPMN: (1) surveillance using consensus guidelines
for surgical resection (surveillance strategy), (2) surgical resection
based on symptoms without surveillance (no surveillance strategy),
and (3) immediate surgery (surgery strategy). The primary outcomes
were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness
ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis was performed over a wide ranges
of estimates. RESULTS: The no surveillance strategy was the least
costly, but also the least effective, while the surgery strategy
was the most costly and most effective. Compared to the no surveillance
strategy, the surveillance strategy cost an additional $20,096 per
QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the surgery strategy
compared with the surveillance strategy was $132,436 per QALY. In
a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, if society was willing to pay
$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, then 88.1% of patients
using the surveillance strategy would be within budget. CONCLUSIONS:
Immediate surgery is the most effective, but may be prohibitively
expensive. The surveillance strategy is a cost-effective option compared
to no surveillance. |
||